folder Filed in Rebrands
150+ Companies that Nailed their Rebranding Efforts by Securing Matching .com Domains
By SmartBranding Team access_time 2 min read

In today’s world, having a strong and memorable brand name is crucial for the success of any business. A well-crafted brand name can capture the essence of a company, convey its unique value proposition, and establish a strong emotional connection with its target audience. However, creating the perfect brand name is not always easy, and many businesses struggle to find a name that truly resonates with their customers. Nobody picks a name for their brand with the idea to change it. But businesses change – sometimes they expand over borders and offering beyond their founders wildest dreams, sometimes there are legal issues, sometimes the market demands it, sometimes the original name was a compromise to begin with.

Many companies have turned to rebranding. Some of the most common reasons for that are

  • To better reflect the company values and mission
  • To stay current and relevant in the industry
  • To differentiate the brand from competitors
  • To appeal to a new target audience or expand into a new market
  • To shed negative associations or perceptions of the brand
  • To simplify or streamline the brand name or messaging
  • To signal a change in ownership or leadership
  • To comply with legal or regulatory requirements
  • To unify the brand after a merger or acquisition
  • To consolidate the brand when there is a mismatch between the brand desired identity and how consumers and business partners refer to it
  • To secure a matching .com domain name that is easy to remember and type
  • To eliminate confusion with a similar or unrelated domain name owned by another company or individual

In this table, we have compiled a list of businesses that successfully rebranded to better names and secured the matching .com domain names for them.

company old name challenges new name price story
Bus sharethebus.com The previous name confined the company to the perception of solely a bus-sharing platform, impeding their ability to broaden their services beyond that and provide customers with a more comprehensive range of solutions. bus.com NA
Arcadia arcadiapower.com The previous name may create a misconception that Arcadia's scope is power plants, which potentially causes misalignment with the company's overarching mission and values. arcadia.com NA
Dominos dominospizza.com The old name restricted the company to just "pizza," limiting its appeal to other offerings. dominos.com NA
Sunshine lumilabs.com The old company name is less clear and memorable, while "Sunshine" is a well-known and positive term that immediately evokes warmth and positivity. sunshine.com NA
Experience socialsurvey.com The old name implies a focus solely on social media-related surveys, which can hinder the company's ability to attract potential customers who are looking for a wider range of solutions. experience.com NA
Angi angieslist.com As the company evolved to offer more than just a list, the old name became too narrow and didn't accurately reflect the company's offerings. angi.com NA
Oda kolonial.no Before the rebrand, the company used a country code domain, which could lead to traffic and email leakage and limit global brand appeal and recognition. oda.com NA
Quilter oldmutualwealth.co.uk Before the rebrand, the company used a country code domain, which could lead to traffic and email leakage and limit global brand appeal and recognition. quilter.com NA
Radarr circussocial.com The old name included the word "social", which may limit expansion into other areas of data analysis and prediction. radarr.com NA
Game Developer gamasutra.com The old name was seen as limiting, alienating people outside the gaming industry. Game Developer is more straightforward and inclusive, describing the site's audience better. gamedeveloper.com NA
Owner profitboss.com The previous name was longer and restrictive because it included specific terms, while Owner is more clear and memorable, which can be beneficial for brand recognition and user engagement. owner.com NA
Treepz plentywaka.com The previous name of the company was a blend of English and Nigerian languages, and the term "waka" could have diverse meanings across Africa, potentially causing confusion among customers and deviating from the company's vision. treepz.com NA
Runwise heatwatch.com The previous name of the company suggested a limited scope of services, whereas Runwise has the potential to provide a broader range of offerings. runwise.com NA
Simulate eatnuggs.com Before the rebrand, the company did not possess its exact brand match domain name and had resorted to adding the term "eat." This may cause confusion among customers and pose a potential barrier to the company's growth. simulate.com NA
Looka logojoy.com The word "logo" in the former company name is overly constrictive and could hinder its potential to broaden its services beyond simple logo design. looka.com NA
Cal.com calendso.com The length and complexity of the previous name could pose difficulties for customers to accurately recall and type it. cal.com NA
Shortcut clubhouse.io Before the rebrand, the company used a country code domain, which could lead to traffic and email leakage and limit global brand appeal and recognition. shortcut.com NA
Wayspring axialhealthcare.com The previous name was more restrictive, long and difficult to remember and may limit the company's service offerings to a specific area. wayspring.com NA
Wolfspeed cree.com The former name of the company no longer aligned with its current vision and goals. wolfspeed.com NA
Wise transferwise.com The old name did not reflect the company's broader range of services and growth beyond its original roots as a money transfer buisness. wise.com $2M
B1 block.one The previous name was not protected with an exact brand match .com domain name, which could have led to confusion and difficulty in accessing it. b1.com NA
Compass urbancompass.com The old name was more restrictive, long and potentially difficult to remember. compass.com NA
Shokz aftershokz.com The previous name was longer and difficult to remember, potentially impeding the establishment of brand recognition and the growth of the business. shokz.com NA
Redpanda vectorized.io Before the rebrand, the company used a country code domain, which could lead to traffic and email leakage and limit global brand appeal and recognition. redpanda.com NA
Ortto autopilotapp.com Before the rebrand, the company did not possess its exact brand match domain name and had resorted to adding the word "app." This may cause confusion among customers and pose a potential barrier to the company's growth. ortto.com NA
Sago schlesingergroup.com The old name was too complex and not easy to remember, which could have affected the brand's visibility and recognition. sago.com NA
Ignite tendermint.com The old name is longer and difficult to remember, which could have affected the visibility and recognition of the brand. ignite.com NA
Centific pacteraedge.com The old name was too complex and not easy to remember, which could have affected the brand's visibility and recognition. centific.com NA
Zevra kempharm.com The old name contains the word "pharm" which may limit the company's vision and scope. zevra.com NA
TRINEXIA credencesecurity.com Тhe term "security" in the old name may imply a focus only on security-related services, which could be limiting for the buisness. trinexia.com NA
Zeitview dronebase.com The old name limited the company to drones only, which does not accurately reflect the full scope of their services. zeitview.com NA
Tenity f10.global The old company name contained a number and was not protected with an exact brand match .com domain name, which could have led to confusion and difficulty in accessing it. tenity.com NA
Emeren renesolapower.com The previous name was restrictive as it included specific terms that could limit the perception of the company's services. emeren.com NA
AMH ah4r.com The old company name contained a number and was too long and complicated to remember, which could have affected the brand's visibility and recognition. amh.com NA
Apryse pdftron.com The former name of the company was overly complex and challenging to type, and it included the acronym "PDF," which could have restricted the appeal of the company's services. apryse.com NA
Fanzo matchpint.com The previous name was difficult to remember, potentially impeding the establishment of brand recognition and the growth of the business. fanzo.com NA
Macro coparse.com The previous name was difficult to remember, potentially impeding the establishment of brand recognition and the growth of the business. marco.com NA
Navan tripactions.com The old name limited the company's potential to expand beyond just trip as a service. navan.com NA
CTI conferencetech.com The previous name's length and complexity could lead to difficulties for customers to accurately recall and type it, while also limiting the company's branding to technology only, potentially hindering its growth. cti.com NA
Determ mediatoolkit.com The previous name was long and difficult to remember and limiting the company's scope to a specific set of services, which impedes growth opportunities. determ.com NA
Copilot joinportal.com Before the rebrand, the company did not possess its exact brand match domain name and had resorted to adding the term "join." This may cause confusion among customers and pose a potential barrier to the company's growth. copilot.com NA
Calero caleromdsl.com The old name was too complex and not easy to remember, which could have affected the brand's visibility and recognition. calero.com NA
Coviance lenderclose.com The previous name was long and difficult to remember and limited the company's scope to a specific set of services, which impedes growth opportunities. coviance.com NA
Fortra helpsystems.com The former name is longer and indicates a narrow focus on providing assistance, while Fortra is shorter and allows for a broader range of services. fortra.com NA
Monday dapulse.com The old name proved to be a hindrance as it was frequently mocked by both internal staff and external individuals who failed to grasp the correlation between the name and the company’s offerings. monday.com NA
Moniepoint teamapt.com The previous name was difficult to remember, potentially impeding the establishment of brand recognition and the growth of the business. moniepoint.com NA
Going scottscheapflights.com The previous name, which included the founder's name, restricted the company's image by not representing the entire team and being limited to only cheap flights. going.com NA
Howdy austinsoftware.com The old name limits the company's branding to its location and function, while Howdy is a more versatile and memorable name. howdy.com NA
Wellfound angel.co Before the rebrand, the company used a country code domain, which could lead to traffic and email leakage and limit global brand appeal and recognition. wellfound.com NA
Renantis falckrenewables.com The former name is longer and difficult to remember and may limit the company's focus and service offerings. renantis.com NA
company old name challenges new name price story

While we make every effort to ensure the data on our site is accurate, complete, and up-to-date, we cannot guarantee its reliability. Our data is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal, financial, or other advice. We strongly recommend that you independently verify any information before relying on it.

rebrand startup